On Monday, Stack Overflow and OpenAI introduced a brand new API partnership that can combine Stack Overflow’s technical content material with OpenAI’s ChatGPT AI assistant. Nonetheless, the deal has sparked controversy amongst Stack Overflow’s person group, with many expressing anger and protest over the usage of their contributed content material to help and practice AI fashions.
“I hate this. I am simply going to delete/deface my solutions one after the other,” wrote one person on sister website Stack Alternate. “I do not care if that is in opposition to your foolish insurance policies, as a result of as this announcement exhibits, your insurance policies can change at a whim with out prior session of your stakeholders. You do not care about your customers, I do not care about you.”
Stack Overflow is a well-liked question-and-answer website for software program builders that permits customers to ask and reply technical questions associated to coding. The location has a big group of builders who contribute information and experience to assist others clear up programming issues. Over the previous decade, Stack Overflow has turn into a closely utilized useful resource for a lot of builders looking for options to widespread coding challenges.
Below the introduced partnership, OpenAI will make the most of Stack Overflow’s OverflowAPI product to enhance its AI fashions utilizing content material from the Stack Overflow group—formally incorporating data that many consider it had beforehand scraped and not using a license. OpenAI may even “floor validated technical information from Stack Overflow straight into ChatGPT, giving customers easy accessibility to trusted, attributed, correct, and extremely technical information and code backed by the thousands and thousands of builders which have contributed to the Stack Overflow platform for 15 years,” in keeping with Stack Overflow.
In return, OpenAI plans to offer attribution to the Stack Overflow group inside ChatGPT, however how the corporate will try this precisely is unclear. Stack Overflow may even use OpenAI expertise in its growth of OverflowAI, an AI mannequin introduced in July 2023 that makes use of an LLM to offer solutions to developer questions.
Whereas the businesses tout the collaboration’s advantages, many Stack Overflow customers have expressed their displeasure with the deal. That is very true contemplating that till very not too long ago, Stack Overflow appeared to take a detrimental stance towards generative AI typically, banning solutions written utilizing ChatGPT. It was additionally extensively reported final yr that ChatGPT’s recognition had severely decreased Stack Overflow’s site visitors, although the corporate appeared to later refute that, claiming defective evaluation by outsiders.
Because the announcement, some customers have tried to change or delete their Stack Overflow posts in protest, arguing that the transfer steals the labor of those that contributed to the platform and not using a approach to choose out. In retaliation, Stack Overflow employees have reportedly been banning these customers whereas erasing or reverting the protest posts. On Monday, a Stack Overflow person named Ben took to Mastodon to share his expertise of getting suspended after posting a protest message:
Stack Overflow introduced that they’re partnering with OpenAI, so I attempted to delete my highest-rated solutions.
Stack Overflow doesn’t allow you to delete questions which have accepted solutions and plenty of upvotes as a result of it could take away information from the group.
So as a substitute I modified my highest-rated solutions to a protest message.
Inside an hour mods had modified the questions again and suspended my account for 7 days.
Stack Overflow moderators have acknowledged that after posts are made, they turn into “a part of the collective efforts” of different contributors and will solely be eliminated below extraordinary circumstances, in keeping with The Verge. Stack Overflow’s phrases of service additionally state that customers can not revoke permission for Stack Overflow to make use of their contributed content material.
Whereas Stack Overflow owns person posts, the positioning makes use of a Artistic Commons 4.0 license that requires attribution. We’ll see if the ChatGPT integrations, which haven’t rolled out but, will honor that license to the satisfaction of disgruntled Stack Overflow customers. For now, the battle continues.
